EnigmA Amiga Run 1997 July/EnigmA AMIGA RUN 20 (1997)(G.R. Edizioni)(IT)[!][issue 1997-07 & 08][EAR-CD IV].iso/lightwave/lwmlist/95.lightwave-10/001513_owner-lightwav…mail.webcom.com_Fri Oct 27 14:27:42 1995.msg

Internet Message Format | 1995-11-07 | 3KB

Received: by mail.webcom.com
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA251879262; Fri, 27 Oct 1995 14:27:42 -0700
Return-Path: <[e-mail]>
Received: from pulm1.accessone.com by mail.webcom.com with SMTP
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA251789256; Fri, 27 Oct 1995 14:27:36 -0700
Received: from 206.64.63.166 (jeric.accessone.com) by pulm1.accessone.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
    id AA06196; Fri, 27 Oct 95 14:09:30 PDT
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 95 14:09:29 PDT
Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: GLOW and FIELD RENDERING QUESTION
To: Robert Cohen <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSD/[e-mail]>
X-Mailer: SPRY Mail Version: 04.00.06.17
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: bulk

D'oh!  Now I see what you mean, persistance of vision....

On Fri, 27 Oct 1995, Robert Cohen <[e-mail]> wrote:
>On Fri, 27 Oct 1995 [e-mail] wrote:
>> On Thu, 26 Oct 1995, Robert Cohen <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>
>> >My original point, was that since the human eye cannot detect an on to
>> >off sequence of light (or image) which is faster than one tenth of a
>> >second,
>>
>>     This has got to be wrong, since I and many/most of my colleagues have no
>> problem seeing "flash frames" in the edit suite, and they are only 1/30th of
>> a second.
>
>NO, this information is not wrong.  What I should have said (now that I
>re-read it) is that, with an "on to off" duration of 10th of a second
>or faster, the eye would not detect of the off.

    AHHH, indeed!  For an ON to OFF (to on) this is true.  I was considering
the OFF to ON to OFF situation, via poorly reading your post.

>Therefore, the "apparent" resolution of a frame which was FR rendered
>will not appear to have less resolution when viewed in REAL TIME.  And
>this was the point I was making.
>
>Hope this makes more sense ;))
>Robert Cohen <[e-mail]> sent this message.

    Just another good reason to compose email OFF-line.

****************************************************************************
** [e-mail]                   |  Synergy Graphix & Animation
** Welcome to Seattle, have a latte'!      | Technical Subjects a Specialty!
** Don't make me force it down your throat.....
****************************************************************************
--
[e-mail] sent this message.
To Post a Message           : [e-mail]
Un/Subscription Requests To : [e-mail]
(DIGEST)                 or : [e-mail]
Administrative Items To     : [e-mail]